From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug  1 18:15:16 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA20504
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 18:15:16 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA20497
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 18:15:09 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id LAA11613; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 11:10:07 +1000
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 1995 11:10:07 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199508020110.LAA11613@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, terry@cs.weber.edu
Subject: Re: ISDN
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>Date: Tue, 1 Aug 95 18:14:24 MDT
>Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>In-Reply-To: <199508020010.KAA09872@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Aug 2, 95 10:10:18 am
>X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]

>> >> Matthias Ulrich has _explicitly_ _complained_ that nobody did port his
>> >> STREAMS package to BSD so far.  He made it clear that he is willing to
>> ...
>> It's politically non-trivial.

>Or because of STREAMS being a bad word in many people's vocabulary?

Yes.

>If the latter, well, those people don't have to load the kernel
>module.

I guess its not so bad as a kernel module, provided that it doesn't
interact with the rest of the kernel, and people that want to load
it maintain it for 10 years.

Bruce