From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 7 15:52:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 1CE0B16A405; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:52:24 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Anton Berezin , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070207155223.GA34408@FreeBSD.org> References: <200702071452.l17Eqvll083171@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070207150415.GQ16049@droso.net> <20070207152452.GA57244@heechee.tobez.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070207152452.GA57244@heechee.tobez.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/math/p5-Math-BigInt Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:52:24 -0000 On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 04:24:52PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 04:04:15PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 02:52:57PM +0000, Anton Berezin wrote: > > > tobez 2007-02-07 14:52:57 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > math/p5-Math-BigInt Makefile distinfo > > > Log: > > > Update to 1.79. Require perl from ports. \o/ > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.16 +8 -2 ports/math/p5-Math-BigInt/Makefile > > > 1.14 +3 -3 ports/math/p5-Math-BigInt/distinfo > > > > > > | -.include > > > | +.include > > > | + > > > | +.if ${PERL_LEVEL} < 500600 > > > | +IGNORE= requires perl 5.6.0 or later. Install lang/perl5.8 and try again > > > | +.endif > > > | + > > > | +.include > > > > There's no need for this. We don't support any FreeBSD with a perl < > > 500600 anymore. > > Maybe when the ports collection infrastructure starts breaking on 4.X in > deeds and not in promises, we should do a sweep to remove all such. But > prolly not just yet. I agree. Despite the fact we officially EOLed RELENG_4, there're still lots of people are using it, and will probably continue to use (I'm being one of them). Maybe it's fine to allow desktop-oriented ports to support only 5.x/6.x, but something that could be used in purely server environment should probably live a little longer. Just my $.02. ./danfe