From owner-cvs-etc  Thu Jun  5 00:22:38 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-etc>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA00238
          for cvs-etc-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 00:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA00231;
          Thu, 5 Jun 1997 00:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA12202; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 00:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jun 1997 17:09:40 +1000."
             <199706050709.RAA00482@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> 
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 00:22:12 -0700
Message-ID: <12199.865495332@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Ok. If we go this route - and I have no major objection - can we
> completely detach builds in /usr/src from hardwired /usr/include and
> /usr/lib? Possibly others too, like /usr/share/mk. I realise this is
> more extreme than what you're saying, but if you see where I'm pointing,
> it'll ultimately make it possible to build a completely different version
> of the OS on any other version without the runtime dependencies in
> the installed system, and it should not have any effect on the
> installed system either.

I'm all for it.  Are you really clear on what's entailed in this,
however? :-)

					Jordan