From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 21 06:50:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FAF16A4CE; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:50:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58D243D2F; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:50:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.0.115] (adsl-64-171-184-204.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.171.184.204])j2L6oOnr025565; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:50:25 -0500 Message-ID: <423E6ECA.7010101@root.org> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:50:50 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (X11/20041205) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Anderson References: <423AD2F3.50602@centtech.com> <423AD585.2010500@centtech.com> <423ADF0D.5090605@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <423ADF0D.5090605@centtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Pentium-M - not recognized? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:50:54 -0000 Eric Anderson wrote: > Eric Anderson wrote: > >> Eric Anderson wrote: >> >>> I have a Dell Latitude D610 laptop, and my kernel says: >>> >>> CPU claims to support Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. >>> Please update driver or contact the maintainer. >>> cpu_vendor = GenuineIntel msr = 6120e2606000e26, bus_clk = 64 >>> >>> What does that mean to me? How can I fix it? >>> >>> All my various info (full dmesg, acpi dumps, etc) are available here: >>> http://www.googlebit.com/freebsd/ >> > > Looks like I'm in over my head. I think a section for the 750 needs to > be added, but I'm not sure what to add exactly, and I'm now afraid I'll > light my computer on fire if I try. The Intel doc with the specs is here: Ok, I've committed a patch to est.c that should add support of acpi detection of EST parameters. Please give it a try. It probably won't work on all systems since it appears some systems need _PDC support (something I'm working on). Actually, if yours doesn't work with est, it should work with acpi_perf. -- Nate