Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 May 2006 16:32:30 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Sven Petai <hadara@bsd.ee>
Cc:        rwatson@freebsd.org, performance@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
Message-ID:  <20060507203230.GA3870@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <200605072327.23901.hadara@bsd.ee>
References:  <20060506150622.C17611@fledge.watson.org> <200605072200.42529.hadara@bsd.ee> <20060507191641.GA1851@xor.obsecurity.org> <200605072327.23901.hadara@bsd.ee>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:27:22PM +0300, Sven Petai wrote:
> On Sunday 07 May 2006 22:16, you wrote:
> > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:00:41PM +0300, Sven Petai wrote:
> > > The results in my mail were mean values over 2 runs,
> > > only once did I see really huge (more than 10%) differences between
> > > several subsequent runs with same settings, this case was clearly
> > > mentioned in the results.
> >
> > FYI, 2 is not really enough, you should do at least 10 repetitions of
> > each test to reduce variance (which can be a lot, despite what you
> > saw!) and so that differences between them can be accurately
> > estimated.  Ministat is really helpful for this.
> >
>=20
> I'm well aware that 2 is not enough for quality measurements and
> I certainly would have liked to do more repetitions, but I was running ag=
ainst=20
> a clock - this machine might be shipped out to client any
> time and I wanted to test several combinations of OS [fbsd 6, fbsd curren=
t,=20
> current + watsons patch, linux] with different threading library and=20
> scheduler combinations at different thread counts and nice values.=20
> This creates nice combinatorial explosion.

FYI, ULE is probably not worth bothering about.  It has too many
performance problems and no owner.

Kris
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEXlleWry0BWjoQKURAmN9AJ4+rdkseL9s+SS44k1FHLy7jUPobQCfaCQT
mY4gf5mjZoQvumvcIn9OdPE=
=UtMz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060507203230.GA3870>