From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 10:08:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C593A6 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF7F2763 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:08:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYGANF5fFNbsJoN/2dsb2JhbABZgwauTJNlgxEBgREXdIIlAQEFOhweBRALDgoJJQ8qHgaIWAHVSReOTgeEQAEDmW2TJYM6Ow Received: from 13.154-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.176.154.13]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 21 May 2014 12:08:04 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4LA829n001850; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:08:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:08:02 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Dominic Fandrey Subject: Re: Staging issue with staging of net-im/libpurple (libtool?) Message-ID: <20140521120802.5b337fad@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <537C7161.20205@bsdforen.de> References: <20140520085544.GB69382@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20140520140945.1383e5e2@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140520121449.GA70272@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20140520145559.4aed52a5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140520143904.GA70855@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20140520221340.17ba4c56@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <537C7161.20205@bsdforen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD Ports ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:08:11 -0000 On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:26:57 +0200 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 20/05/2014 22:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Tue, 20 May 2014 08:52:46 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> Removed the FIND and re-built. After the build I looked in >>> stage/usr/local/lib and the .so.0 files are still present! I then installed >>> with no errors. I'll admit that I don't understand what is happening or why >>> the touch of the files would break things, but it seems to be fixed, now. >> >> The touch didn't always give all files the same timestamp so sometimes >> make thought the configure script was out of date and regenerated it >> erasing any patches that had been applied to it. > > I figure something like: > find FOO -exec touch {} + > > would do the trick. No, that would run a separate touch for every file. The touch command just needs an explicit time (with -r or -t flag).