From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 11:45:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B9316A4CE for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 11:45:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp17.wxs.nl (smtp17.wxs.nl [195.121.6.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B824343D4C for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 11:45:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp17.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I3K009TNGO4PS@smtp17.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alex.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kruij557.speed.planet.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i85Bjdew002013; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:45:39 +0200 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by alex.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i85BjdZn002012; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:45:39 +0200 Content-return: prohibited Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:45:39 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <755cb9fc04090319073d9b9ad6@mail.gmail.com> To: Nullius Void Message-id: <20040905114539.GB804@alex.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <412F2548.6010501@dnainternet.net> <20040903231407.GB747@alex.lan> <755cb9fc04090319073d9b9ad6@mail.gmail.com> X-Authentication-warning: alex.lan: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any bandwidth limiting tools other than dummynet? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 11:45:42 -0000 On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 03:07:31AM +0100, Nullius Void wrote: > Well you have some higher level tools embebed in some services like > pure-ftpd/puredb you can limit up/down bandwitdh and quotas, etc.. But > it's better to limit it with ALTQ/dummynet, that's why they exist. Isn't pure-ftp a ftp solution only? Dummynet is proberbly ruled out because he didn't like ipfw. Please don't top-post and please cc people. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/