From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri May 17 18:10:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA07554
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 17 May 1996 18:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA07536
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 May 1996 18:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA21428; Fri, 17 May 1996 18:06:51 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199605180106.SAA21428@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: ip masqueradingy
To: alk@Think.COM (Tony Kimball)
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 18:06:51 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199605180104.UAA00295@compound.Think.COM> from "Tony Kimball" at May 17, 96 08:04:48 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>   > AFAIK, FreeBSD doesn't provide this capability.  I doubt it ever will, since 
>   > IP masqerading was considered "evil" by some of the group :-) 
> 
>   Actually, the only people who believe that it is evil are those
>   of us who believe FreeBSD should comply with IETF standards
> 
> What IETF standard would be violated by IP masquerading?

All the routing RFC's.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.