From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 20 22: 5:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail1.netsol.net (mail.netsol.net [216.179.148.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52E337B4CF for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from fire ([63.194.3.101]) by mail1.netsol.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id net; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:09:38 -0800 Message-ID: <000c01c05381$06c42ba0$6503c23f@XGforce.com> Reply-To: "jl" From: "jl" To: "Tony Finch" , "Alfred Perlstein" Cc: References: <20001119225712.W18037@fw.wintelcom.net> <20001121055539.I54653@hand.dotat.at> Subject: Re: res_ functions thread safe? Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:05:17 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG How about do a fork then call res_()? This may help even if ====================================== WWW.XGFORCE.COM The Next Generation Load Balance and Fail Safe Server Clustering Software for the Internet. ====================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: Tony Finch To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 9:55 PM Subject: Re: res_ functions thread safe? > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >I need to do MX lookups in a threaded program, does anyone know if > >the res_ functions are thread safe, or if there's an alternative > >I can use that is? > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ian/adns/ again :-) > > Tony. > -- > f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@covalent.net Chad for President! > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message