Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:21:55 +0300 From: Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland <Tomi.Vainio@Sun.COM> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: U1E and U2 are supported system? Message-ID: <16689.44611.909721.433824@ultrahot.finland.sun.com> In-Reply-To: <20040829085112.GB3971@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040829.055715.02308074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20040829035525.GB5269@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040829085112.GB3971@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien writes: > > This is correct. Please make the changes in the documentation. > 'E' => "Enterprise". > This is not correct. Sun did have machines like Enterprise 1 and 2 but these are completely different thing than U1E. Actually E1 is U1 not U1E. Enterprise machines were normally without frame buffers and package included Solaris server media. If you look machine front and the difference is logo 1 Green circle = Ultra 1, sbus only, tgx graphics, 10M ethernet, narrow scsi Red Circle = Ultra 1 E = UPA slot for creator graphics with 100 ethernet, wide scsi Blue square = Enterprise 1 = like normal Ultra 1 Tomppa
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16689.44611.909721.433824>