From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 3 07:11:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B4037B401; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 07:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD74C43FE3; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 07:11:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (acs-24-154-229-196.zoominternet.net [24.154.229.196]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h63EBrkR046089; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 10:11:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:51:06 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Eric Anderson Message-Id: <20030703095106.11e8dc8e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3F042AC4.9080804@centtech.com> References: <20030520233353.E8403@freebsdmall.com> <3F042AC4.9080804@centtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: murray@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: comments on the new rcNG section. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 14:11:57 -0000 On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 08:08:20 -0500 Eric Anderson wrote: > Murray Stokely wrote: > > I don't recall if I mentioned this or not, but I don't think we should > > list all 40 files in /etc/rc.d/ in the rcNG section. It's just going > > to generate silly PRs when new files are added. It doesn't really > > matter or add anything to the text. It's just filler. I suggest we > > invite users to type ls on their own system and maybe list a few files > > followed by '...'. Attempting to list all, even after qualifying it > > with something like "at the time of this writing", is I think in > > general a bad idea unless it is really necessary for clarify. > > > > I think this new section could in general do with some more > > wordsmithing. I'll take another look at it in 24 hours if noone beats > > me to it. > > Wow - this must have gotten jammed up on hub.freebsd.org somehow: > [SNIP HEADERS] > > Hopefully this wasn't crucial then.. :) > > Eric > Not really, I did get a copy when it was originally sent. :) -- Tom Rhodes