From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Sep 13 13:15:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.jigaboos.com (cx432478-a.cnbfs1.ia.home.com [24.17.99.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36FF37B423; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 13:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (phire@localhost.cnbfs1.ia.home.com [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.jigaboos.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id e8DKEGb06330; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:14:16 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:14:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Joshua Barker To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: "Ludington, Jacob" , "'Michael Lucas'" , "'freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG'" , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD Magazine In-Reply-To: <15823.968876013@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG what you were saying was that why not just go with inbox because you'd rather have inbox, because it's faster and free.. but not all of us would rather have it in our inbox, but yet our mailbox:) On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > Heh what I was getting at is, if some company decided to publish a BSD > > magazine, I'd rather subscribe to that than something in e-mail. > > And what I was getting at was, unless you can somehow communicate > those exact desires back to a prospective publisher, no company will > simply "decide to publish a BSD magazine" because they don't know how > successful it will be and your desires are never fulfilled. It seems > a lot of people are failing to get the point around here. :-) > > - Jordan > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message