From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 10:54:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B9B16A420; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:54:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BFA43D48; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:54:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k14AsElh086415; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:54:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:54:14 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Wilko Bulte In-Reply-To: <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20060204135216.P84050@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:54:15 +0300 (MSK) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, harti@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, des@des.no Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:54:26 -0000 On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote: [snip] WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. WB> WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as WB> what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less. Well, why not take the portbuild approach then? Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and *also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental source patches... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------