From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 16 21:26:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2D3106564A; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35BC8FC08; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 2038C5615B; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:26:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:26:40 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: dougb@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20110716212640.GA13201@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, perl@FreeBSD.org, skv@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: change to bsd.perl.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:26:41 -0000 > If bsd.perl.mk is going to be included unconditionally, what's the > point of having it in a separate file? - perl team can make changes (e.g. minor version update of perl) without -exp run and portmgr approval. (I would still prefer to do -exp runs for major version updates, of course). - easier to read the code. mcl