From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 24 12:58:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263F1206 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 12:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from mx1b.lautre.net (etna.lautre.net [80.67.160.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28D49DD for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 12:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [78.225.128.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: thierry@pompo.net) by mx1b.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC1477E015; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:58:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 51A1442D29E1; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:58:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:58:26 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: OpenCASCADE Message-ID: <20130324125826.GA926@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Andrea Venturoli , ports@freebsd.org References: <514C6398.4050509@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <514C6398.4050509@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 12:58:29 -0000 Le ven 22 mar 13 à 14:58:48 +0100, Andrea Venturoli écrivait : > Hello. Hello Andrea, > Several months ago, I sent you a port skeleton for OpenCASCADE 6.5.2. > The version in ports is still at 6.3. > In the meanwhile 6.5.2 is already old, as 6.5.3 is out. > > I understand there are other ports in the tree which require OpenCASCADE > 6.3. This is the first point. The second one is my lack of availability... Have you checked that the ports depending on OpenCASCADE are really incompatible with this latest release? > My proposal is to rename 6.3 from opencascade to opencascade-legacy or > opencascade63 and introduce a new 6.5.3 port. > I could create the latter and volunteer to maintain it. > > What do you think? Yes, that would be fine! Please go. -- Th. Thomas.