From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Jan 15 21:18:44 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA04606
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 21:18:44 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.149.24])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA04601
          for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 21:18:40 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au)
Received: (from avalon@localhost)
	by cheops.anu.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA02945;
	Sat, 16 Jan 1999 16:18:03 +1100 (EDT)
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199901160518.QAA02945@cheops.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: examples rules ipfw
To: mm@i.cz
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 16:18:03 +1100 (EDT)
Cc: ark@eltex.ru, security@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990114191745.mm@i.cz> from "Martin Machacek" at Jan 14, 99 07:17:45 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In some mail from Martin Machacek, sie said:
> 
> 
> On 14-Jan-99 ark@eltex.ru wrote:
> > nuqneH,
> > 
> > More than strange way to do. natd is ugly.
> 
> Agreed. Maybe I should try ipfilter. Does anybody know whether NAT that comes
> with ipfilter handles rsh correctly.

The latest beta (3.2.11beta2) has a proxy for rcmd (i.e. rsh) in it.  I've
not tested it a lot, yet.

ftp://coombs.anu.edu.au/pub/net/ip-filter/ip_fil3.2.11beta2.tgz

Darren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message