From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 12 15:43:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4130116A417 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064AD13C480 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from webmail.alpha-tierchen.de (port-212-202-41-210.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.41.210]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E9FC812D for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:29:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bkoenig) by webmail.alpha-tierchen.de with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:29:21 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <60473.192.168.1.2.1194859761.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:29:21 -0000 (UTC) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: jdk16 and -fno-tree-vrp X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:43:51 -0000 Hello, I tried to investigate the recently discussed problem with jdk16 where you suggested to add -fno-tree-vrp to CFLAGS. I noticed that the problem doesn't occur with the latest version of java/jdk16 anymore. I suppose the patchset 2 fixed it somehow. I used FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT (October 1th 2007) and ports of today. I strongly disapprove the change of GCC to not use tree-vrp by default and I want to suggest that you to change it back. GCC 4.2 seem to have many bugs and I think it's the wrong way to change it's default behaviour to work around these bugs, because this reveals other bugs. If there are more ports or code examples than jdk15 and jdk16 that were affected by -ftree-vrp then I want you to tell me about. I want to find a proper solution. Regards Björn