From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 30 10:18:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F91416A420 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:18:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from secure.socket.ch (secure.socket.ch [212.103.70.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C1213C48E for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from 80-219-162-83.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.219.162.83] helo=factory.fsck.ch) by secure.socket.ch with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ibvsd-0004Mf-Gg; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:18:33 +0200 Message-ID: <46FF77F6.4030909@fsck.ch> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:18:30 +0200 From: Tobias Roth User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070804) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tommi_L=E4tti?= References: <3aaaa3a0709261509g414e3163mff45f9da3bc4d7f3@mail.gmail.com> <46FF45FB.60902@blosphere.net> In-Reply-To: <46FF45FB.60902@blosphere.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "secure.socket.ch", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Tommi Lätti wrote: > Chris wrote: >> Hi I am concerned about the availabilities of these encryptions in >> freebsd releases that are marked stable. >> >> It seems gbde has a problem when the the data written goes over the >> lba boundary around lba48. > > I wonder if this is a problem in 5.4? > > I'm using 3x300G (separate partitions) on my 5.4 box for a year now, no > problems, one of them is full. > > I'm preparing to update to 6.2 so this could put a big damper on that... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 1.9 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.219.162.83 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: freebsd.lists@fsck.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on secure.socket.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: gbde and geli on 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:18:36 -0000 Tommi Lätti wrote: > Chris wrote: >> Hi I am concerned about the availabilities of these encryptions in >> freebsd releases that are marked stable. >> >> It seems gbde has a problem when the the data written goes over the >> lba boundary around lba48. > > I wonder if this is a problem in 5.4? > > I'm using 3x300G (separate partitions) on my 5.4 box for a year now, no > problems, one of them is full. > > I'm preparing to update to 6.2 so this could put a big damper on that... This is unrelated to the discussed problem, but there was some gotcha that was related to moving from 5.4 to 6.something when using gbde. IIRC it came to effect if you did not use the standard number of keys, but used only one. But it's some time I updated and I don't remember the exact details. Cheers, Tobias