From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Nov 16 3:30:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08A037B418 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 03:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id fAGBU7l21711; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 03:30:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 03:30:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200111161130.fAGBU7l21711@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Cyrille Lefevre Subject: Re: ports/32006: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] Fix netatalk build Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/32006; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Joe Clarke Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/32006: [MAINTAINER UPDATE] Fix netatalk build Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 12:20:50 +0100 (CET) Joe Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > > Marcus wrote: > > > > > > >Fix: > > > > > > --- Makefile.orig Thu Nov 15 10:25:12 2001 > > > +++ Makefile Thu Nov 15 10:14:26 2001 > > > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ > > > @${RM} -f ${WRKSRC}/missing ${WRKSRC}/mkinstalldirs > > > > > > post-configure: > > > - @${TOUCH} -f ${WRKSRC}/config/Makefile.in > > > + @find ${WRKSRC} -exec ${TOUCH} -f {} \; > > > > find ${WRKSRC} -type f | xargs ${TOUCH} -f > > > > would be optimum. > > Yep, pre9 is around the corner, and I wanted a quick kludge to tide me > over. You're absolutely right. I'll whip up another PR. no need to submit a new PR, just followup to the current one. the much simple way is to reply to this mail w/ the patch in the body (since there is a problem w/ attached patch in followups). Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message