From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Fri Jun 26 21:39:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E282E98DC60; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EE16120E; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 847861FE022; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:39:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <558DC6C7.5090003@selasky.org> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:40:23 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Chisnall CC: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r268137 - head/sys/sys References: <201407020845.s628jRG5031824@svn.freebsd.org> <5BE3492F-86A0-4CE3-A27C-8DB5EB662C64@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5BE3492F-86A0-4CE3-A27C-8DB5EB662C64@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:39:35 -0000 Hi David, On 06/19/15 12:16, David Chisnall wrote: > I only just caught this (having seen the fallout from NetBSD doing the same thing in a shipping release and the pain that it’s caused): > > __weak is a reserved keyword in Objective-C, please pick another name for this. Should be fixed by r284880. Let me know if not. Thank you! --HPS