Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:23:34 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: chris@northernbrewer.com (Christopher Farley) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2GB limit on gzip? Message-ID: <dd7sat4ke5rqbbc78f3h7ofmj0mguom82n@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <SEN.984465737.22594891@news.sentex.net> References: <20010312165812.A82168@northernbrewer.com> <20010312173441.A25752@dan.emsphone.com> <20010312195330.A82645@northernbrewer.com> <20010312213743.A7606@dan.emsphone.com> <20010312223210.A83134@northernbrewer.com> <SEN.984465737.22594891@news.sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13 Mar 2001 01:42:17 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you = wrote: > >The problematic machine can gunzip smaller files without any problem, >and I have not as yet determined how big a file needs to be before there >is a problem.=20 > >As stated before, this is a problem with both gzip/gunzip and = bzip2/bunzip2.=20 > >Any ideas? I'm going to re-build the system tonight from source. You dont by chance have an old version of gunzip around that is running instead ? =20 Does which gzip which gunzip give the same hard linked files ? This is a 3.6G file b2# md5 dump-c-u2 ;gzip -2 dump-c-u2 ;gzip -d dump-c-u2.gz ; md5 = dump-c-u2=20 MD5 (dump-c-u2) =3D 8cde4cf999407ab959b1355bd62bb94d MD5 (dump-c-u2) =3D 8cde4cf999407ab959b1355bd62bb94d b2#=20 ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) =09 Sentex Communications Corp, =09 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers=20 could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dd7sat4ke5rqbbc78f3h7ofmj0mguom82n>