From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 8 02:45:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EDA1065670 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 02:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484AE8FC0A for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 02:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so21922171obb.13 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:45:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=1Fa+50Q+UL146sIdSFGP2bWQJfYwystOSjcsfvD5sTM=; b=gMozp0p21/mVa9Os4zZ695vfBd/kkHZ5OE6xL344cH+xq5bhXR4OmFGeKKpQ/7WjEN x8Ty8n7SynPhRwfsAOuy31oBNI0NRVPvvZSsyJd7Q91E82R2Vylxug71LqZMZLM5nTmv 7VzwgHF6mnonRngeg2xbXwO6V4lZvTqrRYYaM+6VKoQM609rZY1IOEn9sA640I13SHvc nK2xo0iLvLw4J0oWwDfmXLbBfrbtFAqZEBu5jDIRYHkHCHbKLQLReeyE9cXa+ILBYOAO GX4QXWJqceaUCNmIBAboMTwJ5/U1JzQ4gsJANElOJXRJqCCXPCWk9CxQADHTkEMSzq6p wF9w== Received: by 10.50.190.163 with SMTP id gr3mr5548256igc.74.1341715502782; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (50-78-194-198-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.78.194.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pb3sm12962076igc.17.2012.07.07.19.45.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Warner Losh Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:44:59 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <07345CE5-EE3A-413D-84BC-C9DA63FCBB9E@bsdimp.com> References: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> To: Garrett Wollman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQma1pHjYTOchoL4wyAXmJcHZhbnHppJaqrwJRkq7aTjKCK7X+cWsc08H5nHHS9+9At5T1zx Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Doug Barton , FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 02:45:10 -0000 On Jul 7, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < = said: >=20 >> BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver >> configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound >> (and which I would be glad to assist with if needed). Other than = that, >> what integration are you concerned about? >=20 > The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only > user-visible interfaces I care about. I don't see any need for there > to be an authoritative name server in the base system. So long as the > resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation.... The only reason I want it in the base system is that ports don't cross = build very well, but the base system does. That's a weak +1 for keeping = something in the base system, but I'll be the first to admit it is a = second or third tier argument at best. Warner