From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 8 23: 1:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3455137B66E for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e9961lF21098; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:01:47 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Tony Johnson Cc: " FreeBSD-Current, " Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org Message-ID: <20001008230146.L272@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20001008222000.K272@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from gjohnson@gs.verio.net on Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:35:58AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Tony Johnson [001008 22:36] wrote: > Wow. Is it just me or does FreeBSD like to point fingers at everything that > is not the issue. I do not believe that my mailer has anything to do with > this. If you cannot roll with the punches, then that is your problem. I don't even think your mailer would be suitable as a crop sustaining fertilizer. > Well deal with it and get releng4 back up. Sure, why don't you hand me the keys to the colo place where it's at or make a commitment to pay my company for the bandwidth and rackspace to maintain a releng4 mirror, I really wouldn't mind that at all. > if "piss off" is an exceptable answer here, then I'd like for u to say so. Tony, you have a remarkable way of putting things into perspective, and I couldn't have said it better myself. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message