From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 2 18:33: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles527.castles.com [208.214.165.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FA415289 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 18:33:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA02292; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199910030123.SAA02292@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: Warner Losh , "Rodney W. Grimes" , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , dmaddox@conterra.com, Ollivier Robert , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 02 Oct 1999 13:15:07 +0900." <37F586CB.EBFC8D26@newsguy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 02 Oct 1999 18:23:00 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Justin has said that porting old scsi aic to cam wouldn't be too hard, > > but would still provide a level of buginess that is too high.. > > Otherwise, i'd have done that a long time ago... > > I don't know, I have never used the aic driver before. It would seem > that aic users were not that unhappy with the driver. It worked for the people that it worked for. But having played with various cards and combinations, I can say that its reputation as being a fragile, bug-ridden driver was very well earned. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message