From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 20 22:41:03 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E686816A418
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:41:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jb@what-creek.com)
Received: from what-creek.com (what-creek.com [66.111.37.70])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83D013C4C6
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:41:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jb@what-creek.com)
Received: by what-creek.com (Postfix, from userid 102)
	id 4AADD73301; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:43:37 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:43:37 +0000
From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com>
To: John Merryweather Cooper <john_m_cooper@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20071120224337.GB12810@what-creek.com>
References: <543425.44000.qm@web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <543425.44000.qm@web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: ????????? Bill Hacker <askbill@conducive.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Tinderbox
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:41:04 -0000

On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:35:42AM -0800, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
> Could not -fno-strict-aliasing be considered as just another WARN level?
> At least then, there might be some pressure to eliminate strict aliasing
> warnings as a necessary component to moving to a higher WARN level.
> 

This is something I'd like to do right now as "a step in the right
direction".

RCS file: /u/freebsd/cvsup/src/src/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -r1.43 bsd.sys.mk
11,12d10
< NO_WERROR=
< 
78a77,80
> .if defined(NO_WARNS) || (defined(WARNS) && ${WARNS} == 0)
> CFLAGS                +=      -fno-strict-aliasing
> .endif
> 


and remove it from the default CFLAGS in sys.mk

--
John Birrell