From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 16:30:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B98B16A41F for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE4C43D49 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7TGUKXx070390 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:30:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7TGUK5o070389; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:30:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:30:20 GMT Message-Id: <200508291630.j7TGUK5o070389@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Yar Tikhiy Cc: Subject: Re: docs/85355: [patch] Error in the pin numbers of the described connector in the Handbook (serial). X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Yar Tikhiy List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:30:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/85355; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Yar Tikhiy To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Cc: jpeg@thilelli.net, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/85355: [patch] Error in the pin numbers of the described connector in the Handbook (serial). Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:24:04 +0400 On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 07:52:16AM -0700, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > Yar Tikhiy writes: > > > It might be reasonable to tell that in general, a null-modem cable > > is for connecting a DTE directly to another DTE. AFAIK, null-modem > > cables can be constructed for synchronous comms, too. Then, the > > topic can be narrowed down to async comms. > > I doubt if Julien wants to do more rewrites on the section. But I > can't resist replying anyway; maybe Yar wants to rewrite it later. I'd like to when time permits. I use FreeBSD and null-modem cables often :-) It's good that our discussion of this topic will stay in the PR audit trail so that I can consult with it. Thank you for your suggestions! > It probably should have some of the cable stuff from the "Serial > Ports" section which says that a null-modem is AKA DTE-to-DTE cable > and what DTE is, eg, a computer. And terminals traditionally have > included teletypes and printers. (Once there were no CRTs or LCDs.) And I'd rather add a better definition for DTE and DCE, which are mistaken every there and then. -- Yar