From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 19 11:03:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B7E16A441 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B70D43D49 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:03:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7602E0BA for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:03:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at atlantis.intranet Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlantis.intranet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id orIy+r9aVTrm for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:03:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mini.intranet (mini.intranet [10.0.0.17]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6892E0A6 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:03:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Benjamin Lutz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:02:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20060515222815.GA2535@picobyte.net> In-Reply-To: <20060515222815.GA2535@picobyte.net> X-Face: $Ov27?7*N,h60fIEfNJdb!m,@#4T/d; 1hw|W0zvsHM(a$Yn6BYQ0^SEEXvi8>D`|V*F"=?iso-8859-1?q?=5F+R=0A?= 2@Aq>+mNb4`,'[[%z9v0Fa~]AD1}xQO3|>b.z&}l#R-_(P`?@Mz"kS; XC>Eti,i3>%@g?4f,=?iso-8859-1?q?=5Cc7=7CGh=0A?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_wb=26ky=24b2PJ=5E=5C0b83NkLsFKv=7CsmL/cI4UD=25Tu8alAD?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1215028.47pcdkniIB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605191302.58865.benlutz@datacomm.ch> Subject: Re: New category - ports/packages specific tools? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:03:04 -0000 --nextPart1215028.47pcdkniIB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I like the idea as well. While the current categories assigned the the=20 ports-related ports makes sense (doesn't sysutils, which is used for most,= =20 make perfect sense?), better discoverability for these programs is a good=20 thing. I like portutils as a new name, because it's easier to read and write than= =20 ports-mgmt. I'd also like the new category to be virtual only. If you look, at for=20 example, security/portaudit, it makes more sense to me to find that in the= =20 security than a portutils dir. And as I said, I find the sysutils dir=20 appropriate for ports things (although, looking at it, it could probably be= =20 cleaned up a bit - is eg. k3b really a sysutil? The tools it uses for the=20 actual burning, maybe, but k3b itself?) Cheers Benjamin --nextPart1215028.47pcdkniIB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEbaXigShs4qbRdeQRAlGOAJsH0jR/b4DXpkoRYHe6W6J1LqmhgACgh7Ri T+hzwroprYq4xIqztLIw8ww= =tQal -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1215028.47pcdkniIB--