From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Mar 8 14:16:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA05236 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 14:16:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from sand.sentex.ca (sand.sentex.ca [206.222.77.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA05228 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 14:16:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from gravel (gravel.sentex.ca [205.211.165.210]) by sand.sentex.ca (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id RAA21238; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 17:18:12 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970308170433.00ac06e0@sentex.net> X-Sender: mdtancsa@sentex.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 17:04:33 -0500 To: Sonja Jo Krenz-Bush , isp@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: inn 1.5.1 on freebsd In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 01:19 PM 3/08/97 -0800, Sonja Jo Krenz-Bush wrote: >We're looking at upgrading to inn 1.5.1 on our news server. (News is >working right now, so we're either stupid or masochists.) Any pitfalls of >using it under FreeBSD we should be aware of? Also, out of curiousity, >what kind of improvements, if any, are people seeing when they upgrade? We saw a significant improvement in the amount of articles we could process... Also, innd was much more responsive and memory friendly as well. It was worth the upgrade for us, and actually wasnt that painful at all. ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa (mike@sentex.net) * To do is to be -- Nietzsche Sentex Communications Corp, * To be is to do -- Sartre Cambridge, Ontario * Do be do be do -- Sinatra (http://www.sentex.net/~mdtancsa) *