Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 18:07:42 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gnomevfs2 and gnomevfs-extras Message-ID: <1076108862.767.11.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <20040206230104.GR3365@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040206205133.GM3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr2yv7chy8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <20040206230104.GR3365@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-T8VnZ1bJE9nuCaZMP8EU
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 18:01, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> (02.06.2004 @ 1619 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 2.5K: <<
> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:51:33 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net=
>=20
> > wrote:
> >=20
> > >okay, i'm seeing a problem in my latest 2.5 build, and i am only on a
> > >quick break between classes so i cannot investigate. but, here's the
> > >deal (this is from a 2.5 system, but it might be true of a 2.4 system
> > >too):
> > >
> > >gnome2-power-tools depends upon libsmb.so, to be installed as part of
> > >gnomevfs-extras. on my latest run, gnomevfs-extras never got installed=
.
> > >
> > >turns out gnomevfs2 built (and i assume installed) a libsmb.so. i don'=
t
> > >know if gnomevfs-extras also builds one and it conflicts, or what.
> >=20
> > Umm, weird.. gnome2-power-tools should install gnomevfs-extras, because=
=20
> > there's no conflict in between gnomevfs2 and gnomevfs-extras. I just=20
> > installed gnome2-power-tools and it does install the libsmb.so.
>=20
> Right. I know it's supposed to. But on a clean 2.5 build/install on a
> clean system, gnomevfs-extras did not get built because
> ${X11BASE}/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so already existed. And it
> looked from my build logs that it was devel/gnomevfs2 that probably=20
> installed that file.
>=20
> I'm trying to understand if this is reproducable behaviour.
>=20
> > >1) does gnomevfs2 install libsmb.so?
> >=20
> > Nope, but FreeBSD does. Here has 5.2-CURRENT and Gnome 2.5.x, btw..
> >=20
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
> > # ls /usr/lib | grep smb
> > libsmb.a
> > /usr/lib/libsmb.so
> > /usr/lib/libsmb.so.1
> >=20
> > # ls /usr/X11R6/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/ | grep smb
> > [...empty...]
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
> >=20
> > I don't have gnomevfs-extra install, so I don't have any libsmb.so from=
=20
> > Gnome stuff.
>=20
> Remove gnomevfs-extras, make sure that ${X11BASE}/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modul=
es/libsmb.so
> doesn't exist, and then reinstall gnomevfs2. Please let me know whether
> or not libsmb.so is installed.
>=20
> > >2) does gnomevfs-extras install libsmb.so?
> >=20
> > Yep, it should as far it does to my system.. I just went to=20
> > x11/gnome2-power-tools and installed, so here's the result:
> >=20
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
> > # ls /usr/X11R6/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/ | grep smb
> > libsmb.so
> >=20
> > # pkg_info | grep gnomevfs
> > gnomevfs-extras-0.99.13_1 A plugin for gnomevfs2 to browse smb shares w=
ith=20
> > nautilus2
> > gnomevfs2-2.5.6_1 GNOME Virtual File System
> >=20
> > # pkg_info | grep power
> > gedit2-2.5.3_1 A small but powerful text editor for Gnome 2 Deskto=
p=20
> > Enviro
> > gnome2-power-tools-2.5.3 "Geektoys" for the GNOME 2 power user
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
>=20
> Right. According to our pkg-plists, that's what is supposed to happen.
> But they don't necessarily reflect reality, and I am trying to find out
> if that is the case.
>=20
> > >3) should gnome2-power-tools depend upon something else?
> >=20
> > I don't think, because it install fine to me.
> >=20
> > >4) does gnomevfs2 conflict with gnomevfs-extras?
> >=20
> > Impossible, gnomevfs-extras is designed to add stuff with gnomevfs.
>=20
> Right, but if they both are installing the same file, there's a
> conflict.
>=20
> > >5) is this also a problem in 2.4?
> >=20
> > No idea..
>=20
> Can somebody test this please?
This will happen if libsambaclient is installed on the system when
gnomevfs2 is built. I think we should add --enable-samba=3Dno to
gnomevfs2, and let users that want Samba support build gnomevfs-extras.=20
Thoughts?
Joe
>=20
> # Adam
>=20
>=20
> --
> Adam Weinberger
> adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net
> http://www.vectors.cx
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
--=-T8VnZ1bJE9nuCaZMP8EU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBAJB4+b2iPiv4Uz4cRAoCUAKCAYb9jwexxKc58z5JnacUYfjAFMgCgn9zD
wdYSe+7YHUAt9GAs2qpfMC8=
=k5Rz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-T8VnZ1bJE9nuCaZMP8EU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1076108862.767.11.camel>