From owner-freebsd-net Thu May 11 4:17: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.surf1.de (mail.Surf1.de [194.25.165.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1927737BAEB for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 04:16:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@cichlids.com) Received: from cichlids.com (p3E9C1148.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [62.156.17.72]) by mail.surf1.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA22900 for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 12:15:07 +0200 Received: from cichlids.cichlids.com (cichlids.cichlids.com [192.168.0.10]) by cichlids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A33AC2C for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 13:21:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from alex@localhost) by cichlids.cichlids.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA14816 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2000 13:16:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alex) Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 13:16:34 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: load-balancing over routes and redundancy Message-ID: <20000511131634.A14744@cichlids.cichlids.com> References: <20000511111946.A5785@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000511131732.A51911@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000511131732.A51911@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua>; from ru@sunbay.crimea.ua on Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:17:32PM +0300 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thus spake Ruslan Ermilov (ru@sunbay.crimea.ua): > round-robin basis. This feature is called LSNAT (Load Sharing > using Network Address Translation), and is described in RFC 2391. > Please see the natd(8) manpage, and search for word "LSNAT". What about the dynamic rules, and the stuff I mentioned? Is it worse to implement it? the LSNAT is a good point to start. Alex -- I need a new ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message