From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 20:38:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B488616A4B3 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta3.adelphia.net (mta3.adelphia.net [68.168.78.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686FA43F3F for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:38:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from parv_fm@mailsent.net) Received: from moo.holy.cow ([68.67.226.247]) by mta3.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031022033847.REDC6440.mta3.adelphia.net@moo.holy.cow>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:38:47 -0400 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 86F9DAAF5; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:42:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:42:16 -0400 From: parv To: Christopher Vance Message-ID: <20031022034216.GA1895@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Vance , freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <200310211925.27323.x@Vex.Net> <20031022024140.GB18351@aurema.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031022024140.GB18351@aurema.com> cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsddom and java's flaming hoops X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:38:45 -0000 in message <20031022024140.GB18351@aurema.com>, wrote Christopher Vance thusly... > > I have compiled versions between 1.1 and 1.4 at different times on > my machines, with mo unreasonable problems. If you're not using > portupgrade and a recent cvsup of /usr/ports, I'd suggest your > problems are self-inflicted. Besides the license agreements, OP's problem was that he could not download the patches (unavailable from ports tree BTW) w/o first removing proxy software. There is no mention about not using a proxy to download the patches (at least it not in jdk13 port when i last built it). One have/had to learn about that fact by tiresome & frustrating tweaking. I was in the same boat when i tried downloading the patches very first time. An up to date ports tree cannot help there. Otherwise, i agree w/ you, Christopher. - Parv --