Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:00:37 -0700 From: "Ben Hyatt" <benjaminhyatt@hotmail.com> To: "Mark Giglio" <markgiglio@yahoo.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: hotmail converted from freeBSD Message-ID: <OE8h9vXsFFsAitVGeSJ00003fc0@hotmail.com> References: <20010424160312.14367.qmail@web9303.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hi i heard this happened and one of their main > business drivers was that "The cgi > "one-process-per-socket" model, under FreeBSD, is very > inefficient." Basically each new request = new process. On a heavy site, this can get very expensive. > I am interested in FreeBSD and how it compares to > other systems like win2000, esp because I would like > to build a big powerful super computer and am > investigating options for my os. > first of all, (please humbly pardon my ignorance) what > does the comment re sockets mean. secondly, is this > true about bsd. and thirdly, can it be improved, or > is it a property of cgi and fixed? Berkely sockets.... Read about it here... http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~bentlema/unix/advipc/ipc.html Um.. take a look at Apache 2.0 - Apache 2.0 supports a hybrid multiprocess, multithreaded mode. > Thanks for you time. > Mark -Ben To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?OE8h9vXsFFsAitVGeSJ00003fc0>