From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 16 16:57:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56E216A419 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE4313C468 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552BE2087; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:56:58 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.3/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4687D2085; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:56:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3513E8449D; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:56:58 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: <86r6fdx0tf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080216113721.GA55702@voi.aagh.net> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:56:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20080216113721.GA55702@voi.aagh.net> (Thomas Hurst's message of "Sat\, 16 Feb 2008 11\:37\:21 +0000") Message-ID: <86tzk8vnz9.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ian FREISLICH , Ken Smith , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RC2 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:57:01 -0000 Thomas Hurst writes: > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav (des@des.no) writes: > > Not cost-effective? What is the "street price" of 16 GB disk space > > these days? About the same as a couple of Big Macs? > That's roughly half of a common 36G SCSI drive, and still a fairly > significant chunk of a 73G one. Granted, you probably don't get all > that many high-memory systems with just one or two dinky disks. Don't blame me for your decision to use the most expensive type of storage available, especially when it has been conclusively shown that expensive server-grade disks are no more reliable than cheap consumer- grade disks. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no