Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:16:29 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_M=2E_Ram=E9?= <martinrame@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63 Message-ID: <372326.12617.qm@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <86aao5bge2.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I don't have any problem in testing the patch, but...how can I do that?=0A= =0ALeonardo M. Ram=E9=0Ahttp://leonardorame.blogspot.com=0A=0A=0A--- On Sun= , 8/29/10, Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> wrote:=0A=0A> From: Anonymous <swe= ll.k@gmail.com>=0A> Subject: Re: autoconf 2.63=0A> To: "Leonardo M. Ram=E9"= <martinrame@yahoo.com>=0A> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=0A> Date: Sun= day, August 29, 2010, 12:14 PM=0A> Leonardo M. Ram=E9 <martinrame@yahoo.com= >=0A> writes:=0A> =0A> > Thanks, but I did a "portsnap fetch update" and th= e=0A> autotools wasn't updated.=0A> >=0A> > How can I get the correct port?= =0A> =0A> The PR is not vetted by exp-run yet. If you're not gonna=0A> test= the patch=0A> then better just wait for it to hit the ports tree.=0A> =0A= =0A=0A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?372326.12617.qm>