Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 12:15:30 -0800 (PST) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb> To: wsantee@wsantee.oz.net (Wes Santee) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: On commit messages for Stable... Message-ID: <199603182015.MAA04943@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199603181711.JAA02436@wsantee.oz.net> from "Wes Santee" at Mar 18, 96 09:11:51 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Santee wrote: > > After writing up the original request for a CVS commit list for the > -stable branch only, and seeing the ensuing discussion on the pros and > cons of it all, I just wanted to add that if a -stable only mailing > list isn't going to happen, is there a line in the commit messages or > some other way of telling that a piece is being checked into the > -stable branch? yes. RELENG_2_1_0 is the key that you are looking for. messages that do not have any indicator are commited to the HEAD (ie -current). > > If there is a surefire way to see if something is being checked into > -stable, I can write a procmail recipe to filter on the stuff I want > to see which may be a compromise that we all can agree on. no one would object to you using procmail to filter on this tag. in my own defense, i must say that mail has been "busy" lately what with the internet connectivity problems in california.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603182015.MAA04943>