From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 8 15:14:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D29E106564A; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl) Received: from mail.garage.freebsd.pl (60.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79F68FC0C; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7E3BE45B36; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:14:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (chello089073192049.chello.pl [89.73.192.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B095A45683; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:14:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:14:02 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Ulrich =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sp=F6rlein?= , Ivan Voras , Alexander Best , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20101008151402.GI1733@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <201010040617.o946HkOO002409@svn.freebsd.org> <20101004092559.GB7322@garage.freebsd.pl> <20101004095845.GA99361@freebsd.org> <20101004104257.GH7322@garage.freebsd.pl> <20101004114248.GA16641@freebsd.org> <20101008103238.GV65440@acme.spoerlein.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x0KprKst+ZOYEj2z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101008103238.GV65440@acme.spoerlein.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.garage.freebsd.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 Cc: Subject: Re: svn commit: r213398 - head/bin/rm X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:14:36 -0000 --x0KprKst+ZOYEj2z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:32:38PM +0200, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein wrote: > On Mon, 04.10.2010 at 14:04:53 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > > On 4 October 2010 13:42, Alexander Best wrote: > >=20 > > > good point. ZFS should really be added to the list and LFS should go = away. are > > > there any other relevant filesystems without a fixed-block size that = need to be > > > mentioned? what about afs? or tmpfs? > >=20 > > (it's not that the block sizes aren't fixed, it's that the assignment > > of blocks to the file is not fixed). >=20 > Review of attached patch, anyone? I didn't come up with a clever way to > describe non-COW file systems :/ Looks good, but I'd use a bit different wording. Instead of: +option assumes that the underlying file system does not allocate new blocks +when writing to existing blocks. Maybe something like this: +option assumes that the underlying file system updates existing blocks +in-place and does not store new data in new location. ? --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --x0KprKst+ZOYEj2z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyvNToACgkQForvXbEpPzTUQACeIytDJAW4y1pEiFiitxFN59Lw T+IAnAiaqZX1p1pfviXF7iL2ThBUzvha =3vUd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x0KprKst+ZOYEj2z--