From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 08:26:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F724106566B; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [IPv6:2001:470:a803::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EF78FC13; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639F7A6B110; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:25:28 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([211.166.10.233]) by mail.geekcn.org (mail.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ETcrHbMC3UAv; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:25:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from delta.delphij.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:83bf:0:221:5cff:fe6a:37bb]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D02FA6B0B7; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:24:51 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent: mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to: x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=a9L3rD6x2qoELxmQsVrC2ePHRHzBoigl/D5ndcpMzTWk0sZBzpHcq1XY005SUyigk EN9VAe6jUt4zuhpf9yz/A== Message-ID: <4CE4E2B2.7070702@delphij.net> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:24:18 -0800 From: Xin LI Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101028 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=3FCA37C1; url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS stripesize patch (in the context of 4k sector drives) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:26:30 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/12/10 10:09, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 11/12/10 16:00, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Any objections to me committing the following patch? >> >> The intention is to use stripesize info from GEOM in creating vdevs, in >> the hope that the 4 KiB sector magic will work. > > Or maybe not. I've grepped and other tools use stripesize in the way its > name suggests - as RAID stripe size, not as logical sector size. > > New idea on the menu: make the logical sector size a separate concept > and a separate variable from stripe size. Would that be a better approach? Have you tested this booting from existing ZFS file system? Cheers, - -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJM5OKyAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBby4IAISFkInYkAa0OWUKtvWZbmdk VUmQHN/e8tToB+Yb6+IRlk0e+Wu2Cqc2TACrdNRgq2f9BNUIjrfkJo1Flz0SlQlU jtkutNVPjyh2aC3dBucWNSGAoadC5qq2VdQgDtzgK0OcNN/EKKUIHadZHWsCqyuD RT37u9FZcBXMytRwB7DFWVLdfTfpTMyyYSBmWRliUFnIg7XgR1YD6Lu3ne2Nzj9/ 7DaF0E308m3VSWyQRgB1l6EszWoIaGVbbY6TObp9zlNvug4wYSuBGvvuT+gojV/J FHSaZDLNg/EhXR0T7IRaqOppvzYz5r2bnaqJr70JuT+9nZJZvV8ePuSuDdFx520= =pB0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----