From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 22 16:36:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@nevdull.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D525C2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from homiemail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6357CA for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from homiemail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075623E405C; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 09:36:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=ozzmosis.com; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to; s=ozzmosis.com; bh=drw4aUmNSIwDMx6FLZdGwJ+FC58=; b= zGAOytijZS1EQAKvle7bM0GiddoECdWrW9h3AYLQ9FcnCdKipjE5VBwj/GpLomKz CJv2sUuCHb2ZcgymbVSdYGCXvQf4nu+Z6u34C+K64zCwc3S4qpb2N6nGwZOoUhp9 /UcudLzj/G50mf9oJHaWMzeRPrMFNqyMRL8LTA8vTJo= Received: from blizzard.ozzmosis.com (unknown [203.217.88.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: relay@ozzmosis.com) by homiemail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6F923E4057; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 09:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by blizzard.ozzmosis.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9B04BEFB; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 02:36:00 +1000 (AEST) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 02:36:00 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! Subject: Re: GCC question Message-ID: <20150622163600.GD92373@ozzmosis.com> References: <558585CB.4070607@hiwaay.net> <20150622154545.GA92373@ozzmosis.com> <55883162.8050501@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55883162.8050501@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:36:04 -0000 On Mon 2015-06-22 11:07:53 UTC-0453, William A. Mahaffey III (wam@hiwaay.net) wrote: > I found some sources online last summer when I built this box that said > clang produced worse code than gcc, that's most of the reason I went w/ > 9.3R rather than 10.n, which are clang based, as I understand things. I > guess I am good to go now, then, thanks :-) .... I think you'll find 10.x is no slower than 9.x. Otherwise nobody would use 10.x. Whatever you read probably applied to a much older version of clang. "Last summer" is ambiguous btw. Earth has two hemispheres. Where I live it's winter. Incidentally your email program's time zone is very odd. UTC-0453?