Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 11:24:47 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/xntpd/parse/util dcfd.c testdcf.c src/usr.sbin/xntpd/xntpd refclock_acts.c refclock_heath.c Message-ID: <9574.916482287@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 16 Jan 1999 10:27:52 %2B0100." <19990116102752.A22004@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990116102752.A22004@titan.klemm.gtn.com>, Andreas Klemm writes: >On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 09:29:59PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> >> Modified files: >> >> usr.sbin/xntpd/parse/util dcfd.c testdcf.c >> >> Log: >> >> Fix leap year calculations, including 2000. The code was broken for all >> >> years! >> >> Reviewed by: <thepish@freebsd.org>, <ishisone@sra.co.jp> >> > >> >Has this been reported back to the xntpd authors? >> > >> >It really surprises me that xntpd has such a problem. >> >> We're way behind in (x)ntp releases... > >I did the ntp port months ago, so that we can track the quality >of the new ntp releases more easily. > >What about importing a newer ntp version now ? >Or is the new version still a moving target ? >I don't have any useful information on this, perhaps you know more ? Once we get the new nanokernel support integrated I think it will be time, but until then I think it is too volatile. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9574.916482287>