From owner-freebsd-current Thu Nov 12 12:22:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA17339 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 12:22:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from feral-gw.feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA17333 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 12:22:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by feral-gw.feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA26105; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 12:20:52 -0800 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 12:20:52 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-Sender: mjacob@feral-gw Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Open Systems Networking cc: John Sconiers , David Holland , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it soup yet? FreeBSD NFS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Just out of curiosity, is NFS a big deal because you HAVE to have it for > existing NFS implementations or is it becasue you WANT NFS. It's required for interoperability with other systems. > I ask because im wondering if anyone uses CODA instead? > It is at least actively maintained. Like I said if its because you HAVE to > have NFS thats cool. But im wondering if people are just using NFS > because that may be all they think there is or all they know of. No. Not necessarily. I use SMB a lot (for interoperability with Win32 systems). I haven't tried the CODA stuff. Is it any good? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message