From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 15:15:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EA392A3 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from keltia.net (aran.keltia.net [88.191.250.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20AA9217B for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roberto-aw.eurocontrol.fr (unknown [88.190.16.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roberto) by keltia.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDF8352A9 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:15:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:12:07 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: official pkg repo with WITHOUT_X11=true Message-ID: <20140602151207.GH66852@roberto-aw.eurocontrol.fr> References: <20F90EAB-ADC5-468C-9AFD-73F93794C4B2@FreeBSD.org> <800bc8e04e4cfed10632cca993cce8fa@shatow.net> <43B971CB-4810-458D-BC5D-3DC2DC764E39@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B971CB-4810-458D-BC5D-3DC2DC764E39@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / Macbook Pro - FreeBSD 7.2 / Dell D820 SMP User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:15:30 -0000 According to David Chisnall on Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:19:41AM +0100: > We can probably do a bit better by looking at the complete dependency graph and removing any ports that have unconditional dependencies on X. For a headless server, there's no reason to build any of the kde-* or gnome-* ports or, indeed, X itself. I suspect that we could easily trim 2/3 of the build time by omitting ports that have a GUI, GUI toolkits, and so on. May I disagree? The only thing you don't need on an headless server is X itself. I might want to run firefox on that server, the display taken into account in the client machine (e.g. through ssh -X). Or did I missed something? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.net In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/