From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 8 15:13:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E580F106566C for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:13:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF56B8FC12 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26892 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2010 15:13:54 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jan 2010 15:13:54 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9685850825; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:13:52 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: User questions References: <201001081458.23050.pieter@service2media.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:13:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Carmel's message of "Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:40:01 -0500") Message-ID: <44ljg8y6hb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Accessing Computer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:13:55 -0000 Carmel writes: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:58:23 +0100 Pieter de Goeje articulated: > >> You might want to take a look at ssh-agent. I think PuTTY has an equivalent. >> It lets you do remote logins without putting your key(s) everywhere. I've not >> yet tried this myself, but I plan on testing it sometime. > > I use agent. All that agent does is cache your password so you do not > have to re-enter it each time you make a connection. The agent can be forwarded with the connection. In your case, it would remove the need for a second key on the second machine. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/