From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 6 14:32:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8091216A404 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E16F13C459 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so1046139ana for ; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SH82cGVdcJZo+Ndaow5h4Jbrqmw3pwAAVMaUm6TDqLJG2wehPGnu//oW32PIxIPdy07NO00cJ0dGio+XPZ2Zj5lv1UolLJ0w2RvLMp8L1lj4HPS+mvk4Qj9kZwJKvw3XJQJmbqbdAFmBRaQ3GBaKXU2k5ojDUXLVRFTUzXuzQsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dqmSc82ISI54oE12PImm3uHiIJIKF7LtJx3NcGWhIDVsOfR5DmrpFp6MeMuwhTOMpkVZAGMuMUfFjhdXlzavTrkX02qtjPWrAnDu1dz3ikJ48XJscOB4bSS1pyVKRptKXOtCzHn7otkrq7s9X87r5EsN/4igCcA+OQaSbhkRKro= Received: by 10.100.190.8 with SMTP id n8mr2131271anf.1175869919173; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.109.12 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:31:59 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Ed Schouten" In-Reply-To: <20070406142326.GC6950@hoeg.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070405103708.GC842@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20070405.140109.39240822.imp@bsdimp.com> <20070406142326.GC6950@hoeg.nl> Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Do we need this junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:32:00 -0000 On 4/6/07, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Nikolas Britton wrote: > > Well based on the stats I've posted maybe it's time to split FreeBSD > > i386 into two platforms, one for embedded/legacy systems and one for > > modern systems? The needs for each type of system are diametrically > > opposed, and the modern ones make up the majority of deployed systems. > > Perhaps FreeBSD i786 or IA32, with the minimum target being a > > Willamette based Pentium 4, aka SSE2? > > So what's the practical advantage of that? That would only break stuff. > Compiling a kernel without these options practically does the same > thing. > Break what? The primary reason for doing this is optimization and simplification of support / development.