From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Nov 16 4: 3:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.noos.fr (descartes.noos.net [212.198.2.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8F37B419 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 04:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 46345864 invoked by uid 0); 16 Nov 2001 12:03:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.145]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.74 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 16 Nov 2001 12:03:25 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fAGC3FI05149; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:03:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from root) Message-Id: <200111161203.fAGC3FI05149@gits.dyndns.org> Subject: Re: PORTVERSION=6.1 wrong in linux_base-62 ??? In-Reply-To: <20011115211037.B721@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> To: Marcel Moolenaar Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:03:15 +0100 (CET) Cc: "David O'Brien" , Andreas Klemm , ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: clefevre@citeweb.net From: Cyrille Lefevre Organization: ACME X-Face: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL95a (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:36:37AM +0100, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:03:11AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > [snip] > > > > For linux_base, I don't see that need. The 7.1 version > > > > should include any needed 6.2 "compat" libs(bits). > > > > > > No. The linux_base-7 port should install a minimal set of Red Hat 7.x > > > packages. If Red Hat 7.x sucks, linux_base-7 will sucks. It's that > > > simple... > > > > I guess David was thinking to something like linux_compat-7 which > > install cleanly over linux_base-7 as linux_devtools and such do. > > > > so, linux ports which require 7.1 are safe w/ linux_base-7 and > > the ones which require 6.x are safe w/ linux_compat-7. no more > > need to install linux_base-7 over linux_base or whatever... > > We don't need ports for that. People have all the freedom to > remove and install packages to tweak the environment for their > needs. The port is kept clean especially for that reason. are you saying me that if I want staroffice-6, I have to get rid of linux_base-6, to install linux_base-7 and to tweak it myself to make linux_netscape working fine ? are you serious... I a wonderfull world, I only have to install linux_base-7 to make staroffice-6 happy, and linux_compat-7 to make linux_netscape happy. no more, no less. so, a compat port would greatly simplify things and linux_base-6 wouldn't be needed any more. that is what I anderstand but maybe I'm wrong somewhere. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message