From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 16:10:32 2015
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 3CAF7ACB; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:10:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:10:32 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Frederic Culot <culot@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r376964 - head/www/piwik
Message-ID: <20150113161032.GA64798@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201501131604.t0DG4vFT079135@svn.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201501131604.t0DG4vFT079135@svn.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:10:32 -0000

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:04:57PM +0000, Frederic Culot wrote:
> New Revision: 376964
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/376964
> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r376964/
> 
> Log:
>   - Update to 2.10.0
>   
>   Changes:	http://piwik.org/changelog/piwik-2-10-0/
>   PR:		ports/196524

Per https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=ports/196524:

	'ports/196524' is not a valid bug number nor an alias to a bug.

In case you didn't notice, FreeBSD had moved from GNATS to Bugzilla quite
a while ago.  Old PR attribution is now plain wrong.

./danfe

P.S.  This was brought up on our svn-* lists several times.  Don't we
have an obligation for all committers to follow their particular list?