From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 14:24:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2321065673 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E481E8FC19 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5LEONQx003130; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:24:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5LEONEN003127; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:24:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:24:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Hooman Fazaeli In-Reply-To: <4FE32C16.3050205@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <4FE32C16.3050205@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:24:24 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:24:27 -0000 On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: > On 6/21/2012 4:22 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty. >> And it works fast. >> > What options are there for >2TB file systems with UFS? > the same as for <2TB filesystems.