From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 23 20:09:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5622C16A4CE for ; Sun, 23 May 2004 20:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ojoink.com (center.ojoink.com [216.65.123.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAD543D31 for ; Sun, 23 May 2004 20:09:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from amd64list@jpgsworld.com) Received: (qmail 72308 invoked by uid 89); 24 May 2004 03:13:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAINBX.jpgsworld.com) (amd64list@jpgsworld.com@24.10.96.33) by center.ojoink.com with SMTP; 24 May 2004 03:13:02 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040523200223.01583468@mail.ojoink.com> X-Sender: amd64list@jpgsworld.com@mail.ojoink.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:08:29 -0700 To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org From: JG In-Reply-To: <20040524001819.GA2713@voi.aagh.net> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040523103738.01563ed0@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040522052606.0156fd70@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040521154458.01627688@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20040521154458.01627688@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20040522052606.0156fd70@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040523103738.01563ed0@mail.ojoink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 03:09:07 -0000 At 01:18 AM 5/24/2004 +0100, you wrote: >* JG (amd64list@jpgsworld.com) wrote: > > > I use 30 10000 for everything because I feel it simulates a more > > realistic load on the server (But I could be wrong). It takes a good > > 2-4 minutes between tests though.. :( > >Well, super-smack isn't that effecient; with 30 clients you'll be >getting 30 copies of it (perl I think) It's written in C++ ... you might want to minimally know what language an application is written in before you pass judgements on it or make statements of it's efficiency :-/ > sucking down millions of records Millions eh? What's 30x10000? >each; that saps a lot of power away from MySQL, so poor performance is >to be expected. No more help from you please.