From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 16:31:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E44D1065835 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5D08FC18 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o83GVdZJ014150; Sat, 4 Sep 2010 02:31:39 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 02:31:39 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: <4C811E31.2030900@icyb.net.ua> Message-ID: <20100904022508.W32216@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20100829235431.J86162@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20100830183330.Y29840@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4C7BBCFE.4030804@icyb.net.ua> <20100831003546.K29840@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4C8095A2.90506@icyb.net.ua> <4C809912.1080205@FreeBSD.org> <4C80AB00.4020008@icyb.net.ua> <20100903234130.A32216@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4C810D5A.5040705@icyb.net.ua> <20100904014842.T32216@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4C811E31.2030900@icyb.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi shows wrong battery state X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:31:41 -0000 On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > .. so I can't help wondering if it was this second pass that you removed > > that may have fluked succeeding (with warning) on 8.0 on this machine? > > > > Please tell me to shutup and swim when I'm too far out of my depth :) > > > > Well, I suspect that on his system acpi_ec needs acpi_cpu to be attached to > succeeded, so it (sometimes) worked on the second pass, but I guess that never on > the first pass. > In 8.1 acpi_cpu is always attached before acpi_ec. Ah, noticed that, but didn't grok why. I need to disappear for a couple of days to get my 8.1-S system up to speed .. and to see if my own acpi issue (60 second freeze on resuming Thinkpad T23 on 8.0) still happens. swimming off, Ian