From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 25 13:28:15 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA11917 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 13:28:15 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA11903 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 13:28:07 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id OAA28168; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 14:31:47 -0700 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 1995 14:31:47 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199503252131.OAA28168@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: Brian Tao "libgcc.so.261.0" (Mar 26, 5:16am) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Brian Tao , FREEBSD-HACKERS-L Subject: Re: libgcc.so.261.0 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > PROBLEMS > > -------- > > If you want to run programs linked under 2.0, you will need the > > file libgcc.so.261.0 too (which you'll find in this directory). > > Install it in /usr/lib. > > Any performance gains in relinking binaries under the latest > snapshot, or will having libgcc.so.261.0 be good enough? Binaries linked under the new SNAP don't need the libgcc shared library. I suppose there is some measure of speed (albeit very small) by not using shared libgcc, but I wouldn't worry about it. Nate