Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:08:38 +0100 From: Bernd Luevelsmeyer <bdluevel@heitec.net> To: will@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/25221: new port: "hunt" game from 4.4BSD-Lite2 Message-ID: <3ABE7A76.6F1DC965@heitec.net> References: <200103250637.f2P6bGb58077@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
will@FreeBSD.org wrote:
>
> Synopsis: new port: "hunt" game from 4.4BSD-Lite2
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: will
> State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 24 22:33:48 PST 2001
> State-Changed-Why:
> I changed a few behaviors and made it work. I changed the name of the port
Thanks! But, well, I had the impression that it *did* already work...
:-)
> to 44bsd-hunt to make sure people understood that it is from 4.4BSD, and by
> convention. Also changed filenames of patchfiles for clarity. EXTRACT_*
That's ok with me.
> really isn't appropriate for this kind of thing, so just write our own. BTW,
Your extract mechanism is much shorter, and consequently more elegant,
than the one I had. Thanks.
> no other port does checking on ownership etc. so it is pointless to do it here.
> And also, if files pass checksum, no need to check to see if they make it to
> ${WRKSRC}.
Not knowing what's required behaviour at this stage, I had stolen that
from /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk almost verbatim, the ".if
!target(do-extract)" thing around line 1710.
Thanks,
Bernd
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ABE7A76.6F1DC965>